<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better macro critics please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/</link>
	<description>Sharpening my knife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:09:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I May Have Been Wrong About Macroeconomics &#171; The Emergent Fool</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>I May Have Been Wrong About Macroeconomics &#171; The Emergent Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1049#comment-7219</guid>
		<description>[...] observes that Arnold&#8217;s views are outdated and this is a problem with non-macro economists in general. He points to this essay and I find myself convinced that modern macroeconomics is a coherent study [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] observes that Arnold&#8217;s views are outdated and this is a problem with non-macro economists in general. He points to this essay and I find myself convinced that modern macroeconomics is a coherent study [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macroeconomics as Mind Control</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/comment-page-1/#comment-6654</link>
		<dc:creator>Macroeconomics as Mind Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1049#comment-6654</guid>
		<description>[...] Ambrosini is annoyed by all the macro bashing, and says that one can see that modern macro is successful, if one knows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ambrosini is annoyed by all the macro bashing, and says that one can see that modern macro is successful, if one knows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pushmedia1</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/comment-page-1/#comment-6622</link>
		<dc:creator>pushmedia1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1049#comment-6622</guid>
		<description>I thought there were spots of insight in the Cochrane article (I never considered the possible equivalence of fiscal and monetary policy; that helicopter drops were fiscal policy), but it was pretty weak over all.  

Krugman takes a bit of stupid from that paper and extrapolates to all of modern macroeconomics that stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought there were spots of insight in the Cochrane article (I never considered the possible equivalence of fiscal and monetary policy; that helicopter drops were fiscal policy), but it was pretty weak over all.  </p>
<p>Krugman takes a bit of stupid from that paper and extrapolates to all of modern macroeconomics that stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorstein Veblen</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/comment-page-1/#comment-6619</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorstein Veblen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1049#comment-6619</guid>
		<description>Just curious what you liked about the Cochrane article. My reading of it suggests that it&#039;s pretty much total crap all the way through... Like when he says &quot;Keynesian economics was a failure in practice&quot; or when he blames Keynes for slow growth in Britain, or when he writes that &quot;all we have to agree is that expectations of the future matter crucially for how people behave today, and the classic Keynesian analysis of fiscal stimulus falls apart.&quot; Um, Keynes certainly knew about expectations -- that&#039;s not even something that the average person on the street doesn&#039;t realize -- so how does that make the case for doing more government spending during periods, like now, when there is little private investment to crowd out &quot;fall apart&quot;. Cochrane is utterly incoherent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious what you liked about the Cochrane article. My reading of it suggests that it&#8217;s pretty much total crap all the way through&#8230; Like when he says &#8220;Keynesian economics was a failure in practice&#8221; or when he blames Keynes for slow growth in Britain, or when he writes that &#8220;all we have to agree is that expectations of the future matter crucially for how people behave today, and the classic Keynesian analysis of fiscal stimulus falls apart.&#8221; Um, Keynes certainly knew about expectations &#8212; that&#8217;s not even something that the average person on the street doesn&#8217;t realize &#8212; so how does that make the case for doing more government spending during periods, like now, when there is little private investment to crowd out &#8220;fall apart&#8221;. Cochrane is utterly incoherent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorstein Veblen</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/comment-page-1/#comment-6618</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorstein Veblen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1049#comment-6618</guid>
		<description>What did you think when cochrane wrote this: &quot;Even the optimistic projections by the Obama economic team say that fiscal stimulus will not really kick in for two years, validating the durability of this view.&quot;   --In fact, the CBO reports that about 2/3rds of the stimulus will come in the next 20 months...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did you think when cochrane wrote this: &#8220;Even the optimistic projections by the Obama economic team say that fiscal stimulus will not really kick in for two years, validating the durability of this view.&#8221;   &#8211;In fact, the CBO reports that about 2/3rds of the stimulus will come in the next 20 months&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Note to Critics &#171; The Everyday Economist</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/comment-page-1/#comment-6596</link>
		<dc:creator>A Note to Critics &#171; The Everyday Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1049#comment-6596</guid>
		<description>[...] Ambrosini (who has been added to the blogroll) suggests that critics actually survey the literature before leveling their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ambrosini (who has been added to the blogroll) suggests that critics actually survey the literature before leveling their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everyday Economist</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/01/better-macro-critics-please/comment-page-1/#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>Everyday Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1049#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>Thank you!  I have been wanting to write something about this for some time, but I simply never got around to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!  I have been wanting to write something about this for some time, but I simply never got around to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
