You know what, I do. Personally motivated by having seen what she mentions and is mentioned in the kids+money I have to agree that that is a big problem for many families of the worse or less off.

But I wonder why you guys didn’t get the point? Have you never used of the practice in philosophy to take extreme examples as measure of abstraction towards an issue? Isn’t giving personal and emotional stimulation examples a common practice of politics in this land of the free?

And most importantly it would be helpful when analyzing an argument to consider against which of Wilkinson’s argument it is written, instead of putting it out of context…