<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A neat application of Robustness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/11/a-neat-application-of-robustness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/11/a-neat-application-of-robustness/</link>
	<description>Sharpening my knife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:32:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pushmedia1</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/11/a-neat-application-of-robustness/comment-page-1/#comment-8305</link>
		<dc:creator>pushmedia1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1304#comment-8305</guid>
		<description>AC, sounds like your ready to pick up the Hanson and Sargent text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AC, sounds like your ready to pick up the Hanson and Sargent text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Continuum</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/11/a-neat-application-of-robustness/comment-page-1/#comment-8304</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Continuum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1304#comment-8304</guid>
		<description>Minimax is about their loss function. I get best forecast of the worst-case scenario vs. best forecast of most likely scenario and all, but then I suppose you just call it something else.

It can&#039;t be pure minimax either, since we can certainly think up worse scenarios than their forecast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minimax is about their loss function. I get best forecast of the worst-case scenario vs. best forecast of most likely scenario and all, but then I suppose you just call it something else.</p>
<p>It can&#8217;t be pure minimax either, since we can certainly think up worse scenarios than their forecast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pushmedia1</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/11/a-neat-application-of-robustness/comment-page-1/#comment-8301</link>
		<dc:creator>pushmedia1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1304#comment-8301</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re minmaxing so you can read the FOMC&#039;s forecast as a worst-case scenario.  Presumably their forecast has a low forecast error in the universe where those worst-case scenarios played out.  There&#039;s no reason to think the most important moment forecast is the mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re minmaxing so you can read the FOMC&#8217;s forecast as a worst-case scenario.  Presumably their forecast has a low forecast error in the universe where those worst-case scenarios played out.  There&#8217;s no reason to think the most important moment forecast is the mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Continuum</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2009/11/a-neat-application-of-robustness/comment-page-1/#comment-8294</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Continuum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1304#comment-8294</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not familiar with the Robustness literature but, presumably, it should be about the decision maker&#039;s loss function and her optimal actions rather than about her forecasts.

Why would anyone want to have anything but a zero mean and minimum variance forecast error, model uncertainty and objectives aside?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with the Robustness literature but, presumably, it should be about the decision maker&#8217;s loss function and her optimal actions rather than about her forecasts.</p>
<p>Why would anyone want to have anything but a zero mean and minimum variance forecast error, model uncertainty and objectives aside?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

