<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2010/03/truth-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2010/03/truth-2/</link>
	<description>Sharpening my knife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:32:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pushmedia1</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2010/03/truth-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9170</link>
		<dc:creator>pushmedia1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1480#comment-9170</guid>
		<description>The same standards as what?  I don&#039;t anywhere reference the ability to predict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same standards as what?  I don&#8217;t anywhere reference the ability to predict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swong</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2010/03/truth-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9167</link>
		<dc:creator>swong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1480#comment-9167</guid>
		<description>I wonder what macro would be like if you guys were held to the same standards. I think we should disregard any suggestions from economists until your &quot;models&quot; can consistently predict last week&#039;s Dow Jones.

Anyway - more transparency wouldn&#039;t change anything. Biology research seems transparent enough - they&#039;ve even demonstrated evolution in controlled lab settings (repeatable too!), but evolution denialism is still going strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what macro would be like if you guys were held to the same standards. I think we should disregard any suggestions from economists until your &#8220;models&#8221; can consistently predict last week&#8217;s Dow Jones.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; more transparency wouldn&#8217;t change anything. Biology research seems transparent enough &#8211; they&#8217;ve even demonstrated evolution in controlled lab settings (repeatable too!), but evolution denialism is still going strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Dick</title>
		<link>http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/2010/03/truth-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9163</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambrosini.us/wordpress/?p=1480#comment-9163</guid>
		<description>There would still be the politics of who gets government funding, so I think both alarmism and denialism would survive, though diminished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There would still be the politics of who gets government funding, so I think both alarmism and denialism would survive, though diminished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

